Posts Tagged ‘Breast Augmentation’

The “Latest and Greatest” Plastic Surgery Advances and the Franchising of Plastic Surgery

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

I am writing this editorial Blog in response to an increasing number of patient inquiries regarding specific “New” Techniques and Cosmetic Surgery Franchises that have entered the market place. The typical question is “Do you do (pick a way-cool-sounding procedure or machine) or “What do you think of the (for example, Turbo-Intelligent-Suck-a-lot-o-fat) clinic that just opened up? I must point out that the information discussed below is my personal opinion as a practicing Plastic Surgeon for the last 15 years who is board certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery. I specifically request that the reader does not presume that my opinion is that of any of the official representative organizations within the field of Plastic Surgery.

Over the last 20 years the field of Cosmetic Surgery has expanded rapidly and has become a growing multi-billion dollar a year industry. There have been and continue to be ever advancing technological improvements in surgical procedures, equipment and instrumentation. Many of these have improved patient outcomes and made possible results that were only imagined a few years earlier. However, because of the eternal quest for fame and fortune, some practitioners and companies have become obsessed with being the first to offer the newest, greatest thing in Cosmetic Surgery. There seems to be a new “Catchy” named technique or device every month that is touted as the latest and greatest must-have in Cosmetic Surgery. In fact, if a doctor does not offer this new “Miracle”, well, they are just behind the times and obsolete. Because of this trend and the massive marketing blitzes that accompany these “new” advances, many patients are lured into seeking out the one doctor or clinic that possesses this new device. Manufacturers have found success in marketing directly to patients and attempt to convince them about the exclusivity and uniqueness of their device or technique. In return, they try to convince doctors that if they buy the new device or join their group offering the technique, that it will bring them more patients. It’s a match made in Marketing Heaven but it has one major shortfall. This scheme has a huge potential to violate the standards of medical ethics and misrepresent or even deceive patients into thinking they are getting something that they are not.

These slick used-car-sales methods fly in the face of some rather important clinical facts and traditional methods of advancing surgical state-of-the-art and competence. Some basic rules of thumb are the following:

  1. After all the years of medical school, surgical training and active practice, most Plastic Surgeons certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery are smart enough to know what the state-of-the-art is. Medical Education is global and very rapid. If a specific surgical device, instrument or technique is really that good or an improvement, nearly all Plastic Surgeons will incorporate it into their practice. Most ethical and competent Plastic Surgeons are patient advocates and live by “if it really works and is better, I will do it.” If only “Special Doctors” or “Exclusive Clinics” do it, there is a reason and it usually is not because they are special or more qualified.
  2. If a device is only offered in a special clinic (franchise), it usually means that the manufacturer was unable to sell enough devices or convince enough qualified Plastic Surgeons to use it. This is usually because the claims made about the device were either untrue or offered no real benefit over other alternatives to accomplishing the desired Cosmetic Surgery result. Sometimes the risks can even be higher than normal. If the device has Laser or some other high-tech or catchy name it may really be suspect.
  3. If you hear of some new technique or device on a nationally televised show (I won’t name any, but you know which ones I mean) it is typically not because it is some great new advance or the doctor is so special. These shows exist primarily to entertain and sell advertising space. If they happen to give you some information that is helpful, okay. But if it is “new”, controversial or exclusive, it will sell no matter what. One of my mentors who was the first Plastic Surgeon to get a nationally televised interview told me that being seen on national TV was worth over two million dollars in new patient business. And that was in 1993! It is not hard to imagine that one way to make it rich in Cosmetic Surgery is to hire a prominent Public Relations Firm to get you on the air. It only takes money and an “amazing claim of result”, not superior ability. I don’t mean to be callous or harsh, but most people are aware of the Donda West tragedy. Her doctor was featured on one of those shows.
  4. Lastly, if you hear about a certain new surgical “technique” only available in your area through a special (franchised) clinic or a certain select doctor, it usually means that the technique is so easy to perform that any doctor (not highly skilled surgeon) can do it. The business model being used in this circumstance is similar to the Hair Transplant Industry (more on that below). In the case of cosmetic surgery, it also usually means that the results are so mediocre or non-existent that the fully qualified surgeons in the area would not even consider doing it that way. The only thing special about it is the corporate sponsor and the polish.

As a perspective, let me describe two of the business models commonly encountered by patients seeking Cosmetic Surgery and Aesthetic Services. Both models are legitimate but differ greatly.

Traditionally an individual wanting to be a Plastic Surgeon went to Medical School, trained for 5 to 7 years in General Surgery and Plastic Surgery and then found a place to live and practice. If they wanted to do Cosmetic Surgery they may have given seminars or market locally. As their career and reputation progressed, they would continue their education at professional meetings and incorporate improvements into their practice for the benefit of their patients. This process takes years and is based on improving knowledge and experience, again always primarily for the benefit of the patient. Although making a living is a fact of life, ethical surgeons kept the need for income well down on the priority ladder. They believed that their integrity and good reputation would be the basis for patients seeking them out for services. Because of their extensive education and experience, they can be thought of as a “Master Chef.” That analogy will make sense as you read below.

Contrast that model with the one that is commonly employed in Hair Restoration Clinics. Hair Restoration is dominated by “Franchised” clinics that spend heavily on marketing and centralize their surgery facilities. Patients initially visit outlying offices and undergo consultations with Patient Coordinators who then schedule patients to go to the regional clinics and have surgery by one of their “Surgeons.” This model optimizes the surgeon’s time by keeping them busy performing the service that generates money for the “Franchise.”. These Clinics, for the most part, get good results and most of their patients are happy. However there are some unique characteristics of a Hair Transplant Clinic that make it work well with this model. From a technical standpoint, the procedure of Hair Transplantation, while very labor intensive, is a relatively simple surgery that most doctors, regardless of their background, can learn to do by attending some short courses of instruction. That is why there are Family Practitioners, Emergency Room Doctors, Dermatologists and some formally trained surgeons working at these clinics. At the risk of sounding harsh, the doctor who “performs” the surgery is not really the most important team member of the clinic. The most important factor is actually the Clinic Brand Name, their marketing strategies and the staffing of the facility, namely the technicians who do most of the work of the procedure. Hair technicians, usually highly skilled medical assistants, are the ones who meticulously prepare and implant the Hair Grafts in the patient. The doctors mostly supervise to make sure it is done correctly. So in essence, these Franchises succeed based upon their Marketing Program and their investment in the “Team” to make this procedure profitable. Simply put, Hair Transplantation in not an “Operator Dependent Procedure” because the expertise needed by the Doctor to successfully perform the surgery is not that difficult to obtain. Although not a perfect analogy, Hair Transplant doctors function as the short-order cook in the diner. They are not really master chefs.

The problem occurs when Investors or Corporations try to Franchise an “Operator Dependent Procedure” (the talent and artistry of the surgeon is critical to patient outcome). There are many such examples in the marketplace. For obvious legal reasons, they will remain nameless. They are typically oriented around a specific procedure name or surgical device and claim exclusivity, great advantages or other difficult-to-measure-and-compare factors. Most of these have very aggressive marketing campaigns, aggressive consult follow-ups and pressure tactics. The catalyst for writing this editorial was a long discussion with one of my patients who had visited one of these clinics out of curiosity. She complained, that since her visit (two weeks), they would not stop calling her daily to schedule her surgery. Imagine that! Some of these clinics actually may have successful results, but it is rare that they are better than those achieved with conventional techniques. Many of these clinics just specialize in “Branding” and really offer the same or less result with a nice label.

In the final analysis the fact remains that most communities in the United States have dedicated and competent board certified Plastic Surgeons who spend their careers improving their skills and results for the benefit of their patients. They appreciate the fact that each patient is unique and deserves a thorough evaluation by someone who can offer many different approaches to solving a problem. “One size does not really fit all” in the world of Cosmetic Surgery. These dedicated professionals really are “Master Chefs” in the increasing environment of aggressive “Fast-Food Franchises.”

Ideal Implant ®: Donald W. Hause, M.D. FACS is selected to participate in the FDA Approved Clinical Trial

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

Ideal Implant ®: Donald W. Hause, M.D. FACS is selected to participate in the FDA Approved Clinical Trial

Donald W. Hause, M.D., FACS and Sacramento Aesthetic Surgery, inc. are proud to have been selected to participate in the FDA Approved National Clinical Trial of the Ideal Implant ®.

Although silicone gel implants are now available, have a strong safety record and give a very natural breast enhancement result, some patients are still concerned about the issues of incision requirements, possible silent gel rupture and the recommended costly surveillance of gel implants. The Ideal Implant ® was designed to combine the natural result of silicone gel and the safety of saline in one “hybrid” breast implant. This hybrid Saline-filled implant utilizes a series of additional implant shells that are nested internally with perforated baffles. This design controls the flow of the saline within the implant which, in turn, reduces the feeling of sloshing and bouncing. In addition it supports the implant edges to minimize wrinkling and upper pole collapse. They also give the implant a firmer feel which is similar to that of silicone gel. The Ideal Implant ® looks like a standard saline implant, except the edges have been lowered so it may contour better to the chest wall.

During the study surgical costs will be the responsibility of the patient and warrantees offered by Ideal Implant ®, incorporated will be similar to those of other implant manufacturers. However, the study will also require dedicated follow-up with Dr. Hause for an extended period of time for which Ideal Implant ® inc. will offer compensation. For specifics about the study and compensation for follow up participation please go to http://www.idealimplant.com

If you would like more information about participation in the FDA Approved Clinical Trial, please contact Sacramento Aesthetic Surgery’s office at info@hausecall.com or call (916) 646-6869 and schedule a free consultation and evaluation.

Breast Augmentation: A Perspective

Monday, June 15th, 2009

SAS Blog: Breast Augmentation; a Perspective

Breast implants were invented in the early 1960’s by Dr. Frank Gerow and Dr. Thomas Cronin, two Plastic Surgeons from Houston, Texas. The first implants were made from an outside shell of silicone rubber and contained silicone gel. They had a remarkably natural feel that compared to normal youthful breast tissue. The major complication of silicone breast implants was scar formation around the implant, which made them get very hard and even, in some cases, very painful. This is not surprising since all foreign objects that are placed into the body cause scar tissue to form. However in the case of stainless steel plates for fractures or a pacemaker, no one cares if they are hard because they started out that way. In the case of breast implants, it was a very big deal. After some research, Plastic Surgeons began placing the implants under the Pectoralis muscle in an attempt to prevent this “Capsular Contracture” from forming. This showed some improvement. Then research was done changing the surface of the implant to what is called textured or rough. The most successful of these was an implant that was covered with Polyurethane foam. However, because this foam degraded into possible carcinogens, it was discontinued. The use of modern textured surfaces has been somewhat controversial because they can be more easily felt through the skin and it is unclear of they truly make a difference in Capsular Contracture. Thankfully, with the latest generations of smooth implants, the likelihood of developing serious scar tissue has been remarkably reduced. In some patients utilizing Gel implants, successful augmentation can be done above the muscle.

In the early 1990’s a group of women who had undergone Breast Augmentation and Reconstruction began making claims that their Silicone Breast implants were causing diseases in their bodies. These were serious, progressive and non-curable auto-immune diseases such as Rheumatoid Arthritis, Lupus, and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Since the initial FDA’s ban on their use in the early 1990’s, silicone gel implants have been thoroughly investigated and there is no evidence that they cause any medical diseases. On November 17, 2006, the FDA reinstated their approval for the use of silicone gel for routine Breast Augmentation.

In recent years, implant manufacturers have been using a new type of silicone gel called cohesive gel or “Memory Gel.” You may have heard of this referred to as “Gummy Bear” implants. The issue that was addressed by this technological improvement was the fact that, with the old implants, if the implant ruptured and the scar tissue that was formed by the body did not seal it off, it could squirt out and cause serious inflammatory problems in the tissue. This new Gel actually sticks to itself and maintains its shape. So even if the implant wall breaks, the gel should not squirt out and cause problems.

Silicone Gel versus Saline-filled Implants. Issues and Answers:

Saline-filled Implants: Saline implants are made of a silicone rubber shell and are inflated at the time of surgery to their appropriate size with saline (0.9% salt water). If they leak (rupture), the body just absorbs the water with little side effect other than the volume is lost (Some patients just wake up with a “flat tire”). This is one big advantage of Saline-filled implants. A second advantage is that they come deflated and, therefore, require a much smaller incision for placement. However, saline-filled implants do not feel anything like silicone gel or normal breast tissue. This is why we recommend placement of these implants under the Pectoralis Muscle. This is a sculpting technique to hide this implant under normal soft tissue. In this way, the implant is less visible and feels more natural. They are still not as natural feeling as silicone gel but they are acceptable in appearance and feel for patients with adequate soft tissue (breast and muscle tissue).

Silicone Gel Breast Implants: Now that the FDA has concluded that Silicone Gel is safe, I expect that most Plastic Surgeons use them in a significant number of patients. This is because Silicone Gel is far and away the most natural feeling and looking breast implant available. However, like everything in life, they are not perfect. The most noticeable disadvantage of Gel implants is that they require a larger incision (2 inches) for placement. This fact may prevent the patient from using the preferred peri-areolar incision. This could require an infra-mammary approach and a more visible scar. Also the maintenance of Gel is more involved. The FDA and Manufacturer recommends routine follow-up with MRI scans (very costly) at various intervals to detect rupture. Another concern that has recently come to light is that some Health Insurance Carriers may have issues with these implants and this may even cause you to lose or prevent your getting individual coverage. I have not actually heard of this happening, but you should check this out with your carrier to be safe.

There are three standard options for placing breast implants; Around the nipple (Peri-areolar), Armpit (Trans-axillary) and under the breast in the fold (Infram-mammary).

Trans-Axillary Incision: Placing the incision in the armpit may be considered advantageous because there is no incision on the chest. However, the most critical part of Breast Augmentation is the placement of the implant in the fold below the breast. Since this incision is the farthest from the fold, it is technically more difficult to place the implant precisely. This may result in mal-position of the implant. Also if re-operation is necessary in the future, it may be impossible to re-use the incision and require a new second scar.

Infra-mammary Incision: Under the breast fold is the original method most Plastic Surgeons were trained to do because it is straight-forward and can be used with all implant types. The potential disadvantage with infra-mammary incisions is that they may widen and become visible. Unless I am revising a patient from another practice who has this scar or am required to use it because of the need of a larger incision, I do not prefer to use this approach. However, if I am placing a Silicone Gel implant and the patient’s areola is too small to accommodate a gel implant, I do not hesitate to use the infra-mammary incision and have found it to heal acceptably in most patients.

Peri-areolar Incision: There are three reasons that most surgeons prefer this incision when possible. For one, it is technically easier to create the implant pocket precisely. Two, it can easily be used for nearly all revisions, if necessary. However, the biggest reason why most surgeons use this incision is that for some reason, and no one knows why, this area heals with nearly an invisible scar in the majority of patients. There are some misconceptions about this incision. You might have heard that if you go through the nipple, you cannot breast feed in the future. This is not true. We never cut through the ducts that connect the nipple to the breast tissue and, therefore, patients should have no difficulty breast-feeding. Maybe you have heard that it is more painful to go through the nipple. This is, again, not true. Most of the pain associated with Breast Augmentation is related to muscle spasm that results from making the pocket for the implant. Since the same pocket is made regardless of the incision, the post-operative pain is the similar regardless of the incision. Lastly you might think that going through the nipple causes the nipple to become numb. This is not true either. However, can you get nipple numbness from this operation? The answer is yes. But it has little to do with the incision. The nerves that go to the nipple are located near the pocket for the implant and commonly get stretched and bruised. If they get stretched or bruised enough, they can stop working. In the 15 to 20 percent of cases that have numbness after surgery, most will resolve and be normal at 12 months.

Trans-umbilical (Belly Button): For a while it was trendy to put Saline implants in through the belly button. Because of the difficulty controlling where the implant would end up, the inability to safely place the implant under the muscle and the great difficulty of fixing anything, this option is not well thought of by the vast majority of Board Certified Plastic Surgeons.

Breast augmentation is performed as an outpatient. Although some practices perform Breast Augmentation with sedation and local anesthesia, I believe that general anesthesia (being completely asleep) is a much more pleasant experience which allows improved precision in implant placement. The risks of general anesthesia are greatly over-stated by some sources. After being in practice for 15 years, I would argue it is much safer than sedation. In fact, patients have a much larger risk of injury and death by getting into their car than from the sophisticated general anesthesia techniques now available.

Most patients take 4 to 7 days off of work. Most patients can only lift 10 to 15 pounds for the first two weeks. Mild exercise can usually be started in two weeks but upper body work outs should be put off for four to six weeks.

It takes about 6 weeks before you can draw any conclusions about the result so don’t stress out. As the implant settle, they will look and feel more natural. They may actually change for up to a year, but changes after 8 weeks are usually subtle.

Breast Augmentation has been a relatively safe and effective way to enhance your appearance and proportions for over 40 years. By choosing a Plastic Surgeon certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery, you can increase your chances of a successful and satisfactory result.

Mommy Makeover

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

Mommy Makeover is a recent term that has gained popularity on the Internet and in beauty reporting. It refers to a combination of procedures (Breast Enhancement and Body Contouring) that are designed to address the consequences of child bearing and age.

With pregnancy and the nursing of children a women’s body may experience the effects of breast atrophy (becoming smaller) and ptosis (sagginess) as well as abdominal muscle and skin laxity. This may also be accompanied by the undesired deposition of fat on the hips, outside thighs and abdomen. The typical “Mommy Makeover” consists of the combination of a breast enhancement (Breast Augmentation and/ or Breast Lift (Mastopexy) and body contouring (Liposuction and/or Tummy Tuck).

Depending on the number of pregnancies, the length of time she nurses and her genetics, a woman may experience a decrease in size of her breasts as well as sagginess (Ptosis). The degree of ptosis will determine whether or not a woman will need a breast lift.

The classic breast lift that performed by most Plastic Surgeons involves a scar that looks like an anchor. Because of dissatisfaction with this result, I began performing “limited scar” breast lifts over 10 years ago. Depending upon the individual patient, we may be able to achieve the desired results by limiting the scar to around the areola or by just adding a vertical scar to it (Lolli-pop scar).

The Body Contouring necessary to address the effects of child bearing and age may involve the reduction of fatty tissue (Liposuction) as well as skin (Tummy tucks, Body, Thigh and Arm Lifts).

With respect to removing fatty tissue, although there seems to be a new “High Tech” method advertised every week, I have educated my patients to the fact that the method of removal and the amount taken out doesn’t really matter very much. What is crucially important is the amount and location of the fat that remains. When someone has a sculpture commissioned, does anybody really care how much stone is on the floor when the artist is done? It’s the form of the object on the pedestal that matters, not what you throw away.

Many women also have extra skin of the abdomen, waist, thighs and arms that bother them. Techniques of Tummy Tucks and Body Lifts can improve these issues. Although claims have been made about non-surgical skin tightening technologies, none have been able to reliably produce the results of the skin removed using Body Lifting Plastic Surgical procedures.

Despite the physical costs to their bodies, having children and watching them grow is arguably the most fulfilling thing a woman can experience. Many women are concerned about the physical consequences of being a mother. Through the latest techniques of Breast Enhancement and Body Contouring, many women can reverse these effects and achieve a Mommy Makeover.