Archive for the ‘Cosmetic Surgery Ethics’ Category

Smart est Lipo

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

Smartest Lipo

What is going on in the field of Plastic Surgery and body contouring? First there was simple Suction Assisted Lipectomy (Liposuction for short), then along came “Tumescent Liposuction” with one Dermatologist claiming he invented everything and only doctors trained in his seminar were qualified. “Ultrasonic” liposuction became the rage in the 90’s with claims of less pain, more fat removal and improved skin contraction. I bought the first one of these machines in Sacramento in 1995 and was a true believer until it was obvious that the pain actually lasted much longer (one patient required physical therapy). Also people stayed swollen longer and the skin didn’t really contract like they said. I found that the only real advantage was treating really challenging problems (male breasts and re-do patients with scar tissue). In those patients the prolonged swelling and pain was a compromise they were willing to make.

Well not to be outdone, other manufacturers of medical devices came out with a “better” ultrasonic (Vaser), several lasers (Smart Lipo, as if everything else is dumb lipo), Water Jet and even radio frequency ablation. It’s enough to make a Plastic Surgeon’s head spin. These companies used high-pressure tactics to convince Plastic Surgeons to buy the latest and greatest “Fat Killing Toy” or risk being left behind. They had slick advertising campaigns making all kinds of subjective claims of more fat removal, less pain and bruising and skin contraction. Notice I said subjective because these claims are not really measurable and so the manufacturers can say whatever they want without getting in legal trouble. Besides, if a new technology or machine is that good, every Plastic Surgeon would own one.

Well the next thing you know, the Plastic Surgeons became wise to these facts and stopped buying these “Newest Advances” because they were very expensive (can run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars) and really did not offer any significant advantage. An entertaining story I tell my patients was a meeting I attended in Miami where they performed live surgery via video link with the audience (400 Plastic Surgeons from around the world). One famous Plastic Surgeon showed how to use the most advanced fat removal machine available and the other was Marco Gasparotti, a famous Plastic Surgeon from Rome who pulled out this bent and beaten-up cannula that was probably 15 years old. It looked like it had been run over by a car before it was sterilized! They each championed their personal techniques and operated on their patients. A year later, before and after photographs of each patient was shown to the Plastic Surgeons in attendance. The High-tech patient had been turned into a “Man-butt” with few feminine curves. But a lot of fat had been removed! Marco’s patient was transformed from a frumpy mommy-of-4 to an attractive, curvy figure that would be chased down the beach by all the healthy men. Helllooooo! The lesson that hit home was that the single most important factor in getting a great result is choosing the best surgeon. These fancy machines really don’t matter. However, they are easy to market to an unknowing public, especially if they have a cool name with “laser” or other gimmicky word.

The next thing to happen was that manufacturers began marketing directly to women in magazines and other sources. Now Plastic Surgeons had patients coming in asking, “Does Dr. Hause have the way-cool-fat-sucky-trick-machine? I hear it can remove more fat! Because I only want the newest best thing!” My response has been “Of course not. Why would I buy a machine that does not matter and will cost you more money?” After all, when a sculptor chips away at a piece of marble, does anybody really care what is on the floor when they finish? It’s not how much fat that is removed, it is what is left behind that gives the final result that is most important.

Then came the big investment franchises. Most people have heard of Bosley Medical for Hair Restoration. In many respects, it is a Hair Transplant franchise with a large marketing budget and big referral system to corral patients into a centrally located surgery factory. It turns out that Hair Transplantation is an operation that requires a team much larger than just the surgeon. In fact, the surgeon’s part of the procedure can be very minor. Thus, it is the system that is more important than the doctor. I have seen a lot of their work and it is very good. It is expensive. But this is because they have huge marketing budgets and operating expenses. However, they will offer “discounts” to undercut the competition from time to time. Well, this business model is now being applied to cosmetic surgery. You now see franchises for Liposuction and Face Lifts that tout a specific machine or make claims of faster recovery, etc. It is common for them to hire any doctor without concern for their credentials or experience. After all, it’s hard to get a Gourmet Chef to work in a fast food drive-up window. I recently had a patient come in (she was a nurse so should have known better) who had gone to Mexico for her liposuction because the costs she was quoted for her surgery here was over 20 thousand dollars. However, if she went to their clinic in Mexico, it was only $7000.00! You should have seen her face when I told her that most of the Plastic Surgeons who were trained in the United States and were Board Certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery would have done her surgery here for less than $7000.00. Talk about a ‘bait and switch”.

I could go on with more facts about the Body Contouring marketplace that now exists. Unfortunately it is becoming a “buyer beware” situation. The truth is that the most important factor in choosing a Plastic Surgeon is finding one who is experienced in all techniques in body contouring (not just one liposuction gimmick), is ethical and has the artistic vision and ability to obtain the best results with the highest safety. After all, since franchises view customers as nails, patients are more likely to get hammered. Most private practice Plastic Surgeons who have made the investment to become Board Certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and become expert in Cosmetic Surgery value their reputation more than working in a franchise. Choosing a Plastic Surgeon with these standards is really the “Smartest Lipo.”

The “Latest and Greatest” Plastic Surgery Advances and the Franchising of Plastic Surgery

Wednesday, October 14th, 2009

I am writing this editorial Blog in response to an increasing number of patient inquiries regarding specific “New” Techniques and Cosmetic Surgery Franchises that have entered the market place. The typical question is “Do you do (pick a way-cool-sounding procedure or machine) or “What do you think of the (for example, Turbo-Intelligent-Suck-a-lot-o-fat) clinic that just opened up? I must point out that the information discussed below is my personal opinion as a practicing Plastic Surgeon for the last 15 years who is board certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery. I specifically request that the reader does not presume that my opinion is that of any of the official representative organizations within the field of Plastic Surgery.

Over the last 20 years the field of Cosmetic Surgery has expanded rapidly and has become a growing multi-billion dollar a year industry. There have been and continue to be ever advancing technological improvements in surgical procedures, equipment and instrumentation. Many of these have improved patient outcomes and made possible results that were only imagined a few years earlier. However, because of the eternal quest for fame and fortune, some practitioners and companies have become obsessed with being the first to offer the newest, greatest thing in Cosmetic Surgery. There seems to be a new “Catchy” named technique or device every month that is touted as the latest and greatest must-have in Cosmetic Surgery. In fact, if a doctor does not offer this new “Miracle”, well, they are just behind the times and obsolete. Because of this trend and the massive marketing blitzes that accompany these “new” advances, many patients are lured into seeking out the one doctor or clinic that possesses this new device. Manufacturers have found success in marketing directly to patients and attempt to convince them about the exclusivity and uniqueness of their device or technique. In return, they try to convince doctors that if they buy the new device or join their group offering the technique, that it will bring them more patients. It’s a match made in Marketing Heaven but it has one major shortfall. This scheme has a huge potential to violate the standards of medical ethics and misrepresent or even deceive patients into thinking they are getting something that they are not.

These slick used-car-sales methods fly in the face of some rather important clinical facts and traditional methods of advancing surgical state-of-the-art and competence. Some basic rules of thumb are the following:

  1. After all the years of medical school, surgical training and active practice, most Plastic Surgeons certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery are smart enough to know what the state-of-the-art is. Medical Education is global and very rapid. If a specific surgical device, instrument or technique is really that good or an improvement, nearly all Plastic Surgeons will incorporate it into their practice. Most ethical and competent Plastic Surgeons are patient advocates and live by “if it really works and is better, I will do it.” If only “Special Doctors” or “Exclusive Clinics” do it, there is a reason and it usually is not because they are special or more qualified.
  2. If a device is only offered in a special clinic (franchise), it usually means that the manufacturer was unable to sell enough devices or convince enough qualified Plastic Surgeons to use it. This is usually because the claims made about the device were either untrue or offered no real benefit over other alternatives to accomplishing the desired Cosmetic Surgery result. Sometimes the risks can even be higher than normal. If the device has Laser or some other high-tech or catchy name it may really be suspect.
  3. If you hear of some new technique or device on a nationally televised show (I won’t name any, but you know which ones I mean) it is typically not because it is some great new advance or the doctor is so special. These shows exist primarily to entertain and sell advertising space. If they happen to give you some information that is helpful, okay. But if it is “new”, controversial or exclusive, it will sell no matter what. One of my mentors who was the first Plastic Surgeon to get a nationally televised interview told me that being seen on national TV was worth over two million dollars in new patient business. And that was in 1993! It is not hard to imagine that one way to make it rich in Cosmetic Surgery is to hire a prominent Public Relations Firm to get you on the air. It only takes money and an “amazing claim of result”, not superior ability. I don’t mean to be callous or harsh, but most people are aware of the Donda West tragedy. Her doctor was featured on one of those shows.
  4. Lastly, if you hear about a certain new surgical “technique” only available in your area through a special (franchised) clinic or a certain select doctor, it usually means that the technique is so easy to perform that any doctor (not highly skilled surgeon) can do it. The business model being used in this circumstance is similar to the Hair Transplant Industry (more on that below). In the case of cosmetic surgery, it also usually means that the results are so mediocre or non-existent that the fully qualified surgeons in the area would not even consider doing it that way. The only thing special about it is the corporate sponsor and the polish.

As a perspective, let me describe two of the business models commonly encountered by patients seeking Cosmetic Surgery and Aesthetic Services. Both models are legitimate but differ greatly.

Traditionally an individual wanting to be a Plastic Surgeon went to Medical School, trained for 5 to 7 years in General Surgery and Plastic Surgery and then found a place to live and practice. If they wanted to do Cosmetic Surgery they may have given seminars or market locally. As their career and reputation progressed, they would continue their education at professional meetings and incorporate improvements into their practice for the benefit of their patients. This process takes years and is based on improving knowledge and experience, again always primarily for the benefit of the patient. Although making a living is a fact of life, ethical surgeons kept the need for income well down on the priority ladder. They believed that their integrity and good reputation would be the basis for patients seeking them out for services. Because of their extensive education and experience, they can be thought of as a “Master Chef.” That analogy will make sense as you read below.

Contrast that model with the one that is commonly employed in Hair Restoration Clinics. Hair Restoration is dominated by “Franchised” clinics that spend heavily on marketing and centralize their surgery facilities. Patients initially visit outlying offices and undergo consultations with Patient Coordinators who then schedule patients to go to the regional clinics and have surgery by one of their “Surgeons.” This model optimizes the surgeon’s time by keeping them busy performing the service that generates money for the “Franchise.”. These Clinics, for the most part, get good results and most of their patients are happy. However there are some unique characteristics of a Hair Transplant Clinic that make it work well with this model. From a technical standpoint, the procedure of Hair Transplantation, while very labor intensive, is a relatively simple surgery that most doctors, regardless of their background, can learn to do by attending some short courses of instruction. That is why there are Family Practitioners, Emergency Room Doctors, Dermatologists and some formally trained surgeons working at these clinics. At the risk of sounding harsh, the doctor who “performs” the surgery is not really the most important team member of the clinic. The most important factor is actually the Clinic Brand Name, their marketing strategies and the staffing of the facility, namely the technicians who do most of the work of the procedure. Hair technicians, usually highly skilled medical assistants, are the ones who meticulously prepare and implant the Hair Grafts in the patient. The doctors mostly supervise to make sure it is done correctly. So in essence, these Franchises succeed based upon their Marketing Program and their investment in the “Team” to make this procedure profitable. Simply put, Hair Transplantation in not an “Operator Dependent Procedure” because the expertise needed by the Doctor to successfully perform the surgery is not that difficult to obtain. Although not a perfect analogy, Hair Transplant doctors function as the short-order cook in the diner. They are not really master chefs.

The problem occurs when Investors or Corporations try to Franchise an “Operator Dependent Procedure” (the talent and artistry of the surgeon is critical to patient outcome). There are many such examples in the marketplace. For obvious legal reasons, they will remain nameless. They are typically oriented around a specific procedure name or surgical device and claim exclusivity, great advantages or other difficult-to-measure-and-compare factors. Most of these have very aggressive marketing campaigns, aggressive consult follow-ups and pressure tactics. The catalyst for writing this editorial was a long discussion with one of my patients who had visited one of these clinics out of curiosity. She complained, that since her visit (two weeks), they would not stop calling her daily to schedule her surgery. Imagine that! Some of these clinics actually may have successful results, but it is rare that they are better than those achieved with conventional techniques. Many of these clinics just specialize in “Branding” and really offer the same or less result with a nice label.

In the final analysis the fact remains that most communities in the United States have dedicated and competent board certified Plastic Surgeons who spend their careers improving their skills and results for the benefit of their patients. They appreciate the fact that each patient is unique and deserves a thorough evaluation by someone who can offer many different approaches to solving a problem. “One size does not really fit all” in the world of Cosmetic Surgery. These dedicated professionals really are “Master Chefs” in the increasing environment of aggressive “Fast-Food Franchises.”

“Dr. Hause, what Plastic Surgery do I need?”

Monday, June 29th, 2009

I was at a Swimming Meet this weekend and one of my friends asked me if I perform Abdominoplasty at the same time as Breast Augmentation. My reply came in the form of explaining the concept of the “Hot Topic” of Mommy Make-overs and what they involve. She next told me that she knew a couple of friends (from the same grammar school) who had undergone these procedures. Strangely, both of them had gone in initially for Breast Enhancement and were strongly encouraged to add the Tummy Tuck. This was because that “would make the Breasts look even better.” I was visibly taken aback.

This brought up the discussion of “needing” versus “wanting” Aesthetic Surgery. Now let’s be honest. Although writing this may be blasphemy to the Priests of Nip Tuck, in reality no one “needs” Cosmetic Surgery. They “want” Cosmetic Surgery to improve their appearance. It is elective. I personally would find it appalling if I went to a Plastic Surgeon with one concern and they talked me into something additional.

This brings up the concept of vanity. We’re all familiar with the criticisms that Cosmetic Surgery is all about vanity. Well, frankly, it is. However, let’s put this into perspective. Since the dawn of time human beings have been altering their appearance to reflect the values of their culture. Consider the tattoos, piercings and scarification that are customary in some societies. Whether or not we want to accept it, the truth is that how we appear has an impact on how we feel about ourselves and how others perceive us. However, like most things, intelligent moderation is the key to success. A healthy amount of vanity may aid in maintaining our sense of self worth and positively impact our interpersonal relationships. In contrast, extreme vanity can emotionally cripple someone and turn them into a nightmarish Hollywood Cliché’.

It is true that when someone visits a Plastic Surgeon, they are looking for expert advice about their concerns. However, it is also true that this person is probably somewhat insecure and vulnerable. In my opinion, encouraging someone to have additional surgery when the advice was not specifically sought out is unethical. It is really easy to manipulate an insecure and vulnerable person into doing what you want them to do. As physicians, we have a much higher moral obligation to our patients. We are not selling cars and adding on an extended warrantee. Unfortunately, especially in our challenging times, patients need to beware of practitioners that insist on “the extreme makeover.”

As a Plastic Surgeon, it is a great privilege and humbling to have someone entrust their safety and well being to you while attempting to improve their life with surgery. However, the patient is the only one who has the right to decide what will work for them. I always tell my patients “There are a lot of things I know how to do that are great for my kid’s college funds. Not all of them are good for you.” When considering Aesthetic Surgery, be clear on what you are trying to accomplish and keep that in perspective. If you are curious, get options and get educated. Beware of grandiose artistic surgeons who “have a plan to make you better than you ever were before.” Getting more than one opinion is always prudent. As statistics of patient satisfaction will tell you, if done safely and well, Aesthetic Surgery can enhance your life. However, don’t let any interested party influence what you believe is right for you.